In 1998, the disaster film Deep Impact depicted a terrifying scenario: a 7-mile-wide comet was on a collision course with Earth, threatening mass extinction. Governments scrambled to prevent the catastrophe, launching a space mission to destroy the comet while preparing underground shelters to save a fraction of humanity.
At the time of the film’s release, planetary defense against such threats was largely theoretical. Today, however, advancements in space surveillance, AI-driven detection, and asteroid deflection technology have significantly improved our ability to handle a similar scenario. But could we actually prevent an Earth-impacting comet with today’s technology? Or would we still face the same fate as in Deep Impact?
A Realistic Threat? The Likelihood of a Killer Impact
While the premise of Deep Impact is dramatic, the idea of a planet-killing asteroid or comet is not pure science fiction. Earth has been hit before—most famously 66 million years ago, when an asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs. Today, NASA and other space agencies actively track Near-Earth Objects (NEOs), particularly those larger than 140 meters (460 feet), which could cause significant damage if they struck.
According to NASA, over 90% of these objects have been cataloged, but smaller, untracked asteroids remain a potential threat. While no known comet or asteroid currently poses an immediate danger to Earth, new discoveries are made regularly. Unlike asteroids, which orbit the Sun in predictable paths, comets travel at much higher speeds and originate from deep space, making them more difficult to detect early.
If a Deep Impact-sized comet were discovered heading toward Earth today, how would our response compare to what was depicted in the film?
Early Detection: How AI and Space Telescopes Have Changed the Game
In Deep Impact, the comet is discovered by a teenage astronomer using a backyard telescope. While amateur astronomers sometimes spot new objects, modern asteroid detection relies on AI-powered space telescopes and sophisticated tracking systems.
Today, programs such as NASA’s NEOWISE, the upcoming NEO Surveyor, and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are designed to scan the sky continuously, identifying potential threats much earlier than would have been possible in 1998.
AI now plays a crucial role in analyzing vast amounts of astronomical data. Advanced machine learning algorithms track objects, calculate their trajectories, and predict potential Earth impacts with greater accuracy. Had this technology been available in Deep Impact, the world might have had more time to prepare, potentially altering the outcome.
Deflecting the Threat: What We Would Do Differently Today
In Deep Impact, the world’s governments launch a spacecraft, the Messiah, to plant nuclear bombs on the comet in an attempt to destroy or divert it. This ultimately fails, leaving Earth vulnerable to impact.
While nuclear weapons remain an option, modern planetary defense strategies prioritize deflection over destruction. The concern with using nuclear explosives is that shattering an object could create multiple fragments, many of which could still hit Earth. Instead, space agencies focus on gradual redirection strategies, including:
Kinetic Impactors: The DART Mission
In 2022, NASA successfully tested the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART), which deliberately crashed a spacecraft into the asteroid Dimorphos. This demonstrated that a kinetic impactor could alter an asteroid’s trajectory, proving that redirection is possible. If scientists detected a comet years in advance, a series of kinetic impact missions could slowly push it off course, preventing a collision.
Gravity Tractors: Using a Spacecraft’s Pull
Another proposed technique is the gravity tractor method, in which a spacecraft would hover near an asteroid for years, using its gravitational pull to alter the object’s path. While slow, this could be effective for an object discovered well in advance.
Nuclear Deterrence as a Last Resort
If a comet were detected too late for kinetic impactors, nuclear weapons might be considered as a last resort. However, instead of attempting to blow up the comet, modern strategies suggest detonating a nuclear device nearby, using the explosion’s energy to gradually push the object off course. This approach reduces the risk of dangerous fragments impacting Earth.
Had Deep Impact utilized today’s deflection techniques rather than a desperate last-minute nuclear attempt, the mission might have had a better chance of success.
Could Humanity Survive an Impact? Bunkers vs. Space Colonization
In the film, when it becomes clear that the comet cannot be stopped, world governments build underground bunkers to preserve a portion of the population. While such shelters could protect against the immediate effects of an impact, modern survival strategies might be more advanced.
Space Colonization as a Backup Plan
Unlike in 1998, space agencies are now actively working on permanent Moon and Mars bases. If an extinction-level event were imminent, humanity might be able to establish an off-world settlement to preserve our species. While this remains theoretical, developments in lunar habitats and SpaceX’s Mars colonization plans indicate that a future disaster might not mean total extinction.
Underground Cities and Ocean Habitats
Aside from space, Earth-based survival strategies have also evolved. Some scientists propose underground cities, while others suggest floating ocean-based colonies that could survive catastrophic impacts. While bunkers remain a potential solution, distributed survival strategies across different locations might offer greater long-term resilience.
Final Verdict: Would We Survive a Deep Impact Scenario Today?
With modern advancements in planetary defense, our ability to detect and prevent an asteroid or comet impact has significantly improved. Unlike in Deep Impact, where the threat was discovered too late, today’s AI-powered telescopes can identify dangerous objects years in advance, allowing for proactive measures rather than last-minute solutions. The DART mission has proven that kinetic impactors can alter an asteroid’s trajectory, making deflection a viable strategy. Spacecraft technology has also evolved, enabling faster, more precise, and more capable missions to deal with potential threats.
However, there are still challenges that could complicate our response. If a comet were detected with only months of warning, we might not have enough time to launch a deflection mission, especially given how fast comets travel. Unlike asteroids, which follow more predictable orbits, comets can appear suddenly from deep space, making detection and interception more difficult. While nuclear options remain a potential last resort, destroying a comet could result in multiple smaller fragments, still capable of causing catastrophic damage.
Despite these challenges, our chances of survival and prevention are significantly higher today compared to 1998. With continued improvements in space technology, early warning systems, and international cooperation on planetary defense, the prospect of successfully deflecting an Earth-threatening object is becoming increasingly realistic. If a Deep Impact-sized comet were discovered today, humanity would have a much better chance at preventing disaster—as long as we have enough time to act.
The Harrywell Report
Photo by Benjamin Voros on Unsplash
Leave a Reply