The Harrywell Report

The Harrywell Report delivers tech news, emerging trends, and deep dives into how innovation is reshaping culture, society, and the future.

Can Science Revive Dinosaurs? The Truth About Cloning Extinct Species

The idea of reviving dinosaurs has captivated the imagination of scientists and the public alike, largely thanks to the Jurassic Park film franchise. The movies depict a world where scientists extract dinosaur DNA from ancient fossils and use genetic engineering to resurrect these prehistoric creatures. But how close is this to reality? Could we actually recreate dinosaurs using modern science?

While advances in genetics, cloning, and DNA extraction have made incredible strides, the reality of bringing back dinosaurs remains highly complex. This article explores whether it is possible to extract usable dinosaur DNA, the challenges involved, and whether we could ever witness a real-life Jurassic Park scenario.


Can We Extract Dinosaur DNA?

DNA is an extremely fragile molecule that degrades over time. Under ideal conditions, DNA can survive for thousands of years, but the chances of finding intact dinosaur DNA—from creatures that lived over 65 million years ago—are extraordinarily slim.

Research suggests that DNA has a half-life of about 521 years, meaning that even in the best preservation conditions, it would completely break down after 6.8 million years. This makes the idea of recovering complete dinosaur DNA from fossils almost impossible. The fossils we find today contain mineralised remains, meaning that all of the organic material, including DNA, has been replaced by rock-like substances over millions of years. Unlike in the movies, amber-preserved mosquitoes are unlikely to contain usable dinosaur blood, as DNA in blood would degrade quickly and likely be contaminated with other organisms.

In recent years, scientists have found possible traces of soft tissues and proteins inside fossilized bones, raising hopes that fragments of dinosaur biomolecules might still exist. However, no complete or functional dinosaur DNA has ever been recovered, making full genetic reconstruction impossible with current technology.


Could We Use Other Animals to Recreate Dinosaurs?

Since finding pure dinosaur DNA is highly unlikely, some scientists have explored the possibility of reconstructing a dinosaur genome by modifying the DNA of modern animals. Birds, particularly chickens, are the closest living relatives of dinosaurs. Some researchers suggest that by genetically altering bird DNA to “reverse-engineer” ancient traits, we might be able to create a dinosaur-like creature rather than an exact clone of a prehistoric species.

In 2015, paleontologist Jack Horner, a consultant for the Jurassic Park films, proposed that genetic engineering could be used to modify chicken embryos to give them dinosaur-like traits, such as teeth, tails, and clawed hands. This idea, sometimes referred to as creating a “chickenosaurus,” involves switching certain genes on and off to bring back ancestral characteristics that have been lost through evolution.

While this approach could theoretically produce an animal that resembles a dinosaur, it would not be a perfect recreation of any actual species that lived millions of years ago. Instead, it would be a hybrid organism with some dinosaur-like features, but still fundamentally a modified bird.


Challenges of Cloning Dinosaurs

Even if we somehow obtained a complete dinosaur genome, cloning a dinosaur would present additional challenges. Cloning technology, such as the method used to clone Dolly the Sheep, requires an intact, living egg cell from the species being cloned. Since no dinosaur eggs have survived, scientists would have no suitable host cell to implant cloned dinosaur DNA into.

Another challenge is that dinosaurs likely had unique reproductive biology that is vastly different from any living animal. Even if we could place dinosaur DNA into an embryo, we would need a compatible host species to develop it, and no such species exists.

Additionally, cloning methods require a functional, complete genome. Since even well-preserved ancient DNA is fragmented and incomplete, it would be extremely difficult—if not impossible—to reconstruct an entire dinosaur genome with 100% accuracy.


Ethical and Ecological Considerations

Even if we could create dinosaurs, should we? The Jurassic Park films highlight the dangers of bringing back extinct species, particularly apex predators like Tyrannosaurus rex. Reintroducing dinosaurs into the modern world would raise major ethical and ecological concerns.

One key issue is that dinosaurs evolved for a completely different environment. Earth’s climate, oxygen levels, plant life, and ecosystems have changed dramatically over the past 65 million years. Dinosaurs may not be able to survive in today’s atmosphere or coexist with modern wildlife without disrupting ecosystems.

There is also the moral question of genetic manipulation. Would artificially resurrecting dinosaurs be a responsible use of scientific resources, or would it be a reckless experiment with unknown consequences? Given that many modern species are already endangered due to habitat destruction and climate change, some scientists argue that efforts should be focused on conserving existing wildlife rather than reviving extinct ones.


Is a Real-Life Jurassic Park Possible?

While Jurassic Park remains an exciting concept in science fiction, the reality is that recreating dinosaurs is not currently possible with modern technology. The absence of preserved dinosaur DNA, the challenges of cloning, and the ethical concerns surrounding genetic manipulation make the idea scientifically and practically unfeasible.

However, advancements in genetics, synthetic biology, and evolutionary research continue to push the boundaries of what is possible. While we may never see a true T. rex or Velociraptor brought back to life, scientists are making progress in understanding ancient genetics and reviving traits of extinct species. For now, dinosaurs remain confined to fossils, museums, and our imagination—at least until science proves otherwise.

The Harrywell Report

Photo by Justin Clark on Unsplash